<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bright New Ideas &#187; New Ideas to Reduce Air Pollution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brightnewideas.org/category/new-ideas-to-reduce-air-pollution/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brightnewideas.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:39:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Global Warming Evaluated</title>
		<link>http://www.brightnewideas.org/global-warming-evaluated</link>
		<comments>http://www.brightnewideas.org/global-warming-evaluated#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploration & Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Ideas to Reduce Air Pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightnewideas.org/global-warming-evaluated/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my view the purpose of this Blog is to take a neutral, academic approach in discussing the topics our organization is tackling.  So I would like to take this opportunity today to discuss a topic widely ignored in discussions about global warming, that is; the scientists who oppose the mainstream view of global warming [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Georgia">In my view the purpose of this Blog is to take a neutral, academic approach in discussing the topics our organization is tackling.<span>  </span>So I would like to take this opportunity today to discuss a topic widely ignored in discussions about global warming, that is; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming" title="List of Scientists who Oppose the Mainstream Scientific Assessment of Global Warming">the scientists who oppose the mainstream view of global warming and their views</a>.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span id="more-163"></span><span style="font-family: Georgia">Some of these scientists don&#8217;t believe global warming exists, some of them believe that the <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/" title="Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change">mainstream predictions on global warming</a> are inaccurate.<span>  </span>Some – interestingly don&#8217;t dispute mainstream claims – but believe that global warming will be a benefit to society.<span>  </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Georgia">Whether global warming is an out of control phenomenon or not, Bright New Ideas is dedicated to the idea that sufficiently cleaner air is a human right.<span>  </span>A lot of people have asked us why don&#8217;t we talk about global warming more in our efforts to reduce air pollution and improve health?<span>  </span>Well the answer is because that&#8217;s not our focus.<span>  </span>Our focus is to improve health and access to education for people around the world.<span>  </span>Our vehicle for doing that is solar energy and LED lighting.<span>  </span>Reducing air pollution, especially practices such as use of kerosene indoors, may happen to be congruent with the effects of climate change and it may not.<span>  </span>But at the very least it means a cleaner and healthier world for many people who deserve it.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brightnewideas.org/global-warming-evaluated/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vattenfall&#8217;s Oxyfuel Process Puts Air Pollution Underground</title>
		<link>http://www.brightnewideas.org/vattenfalls-oxyfuel-process-puts-air-pollution-underground</link>
		<comments>http://www.brightnewideas.org/vattenfalls-oxyfuel-process-puts-air-pollution-underground#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New & Renewable Energy Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Energy Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Ideas to Reduce Air Pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightnewideas.org/vattenfalls-oxyfuel-process-puts-air-pollution-underground/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sweden&#8217;s national energy company Vattenfall has come up with an ingenious process for reducing air pollution, which recently won a prestigious award for one of the best technology projects of 2008 by a US magazine.  Vattenfall&#8217;s project is a way to supercharge a process known as &#8220;carbon capturing.&#8221;  What is carbon capturing you ask?  Well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweden&#8217;s national energy company Vattenfall has come up with an ingenious process for reducing air pollution, which recently won a prestigious award for one of the <a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/jan08/5819">best technology projects of 2008</a> by a US magazine.  Vattenfall&#8217;s project is a way to supercharge a process known as &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_capture_and_storage">carbon capturing</a>.&#8221;  What is carbon capturing you ask?  Well it&#8217;s kind of like putting a big balloon over the tailpipe of your car.</p>
<p><span id="more-148"></span>But instead of letting all of that exhaust into the atmosphere, it stays in the balloon.  Then, when the balloon is full, put it somewhere safe, maybe deep underground or in the ocean.  But don&#8217;t try this at home, you&#8217;ll look like a weirdo and the balloon will probably pop.  Typically carbon capturing is done in fossil fuel (oil and coal) power plants.  And they don&#8217;t use balloons, they use something tough, made out of metal &#8211; sort of like a big industrial sized propane tank.  Vattenfall&#8217;s process improves carbon capturing for coal &#8211; which is great news for the U.S. where coal burning power plants produce about 1.5 billion metric tons of CO2 per year, according to the article, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5174391/">debates have sparked</a> about coal&#8217;s health effects over recent years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brightnewideas.org/vattenfalls-oxyfuel-process-puts-air-pollution-underground/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Air Pollution Advisory</title>
		<link>http://www.brightnewideas.org/minnesota-air-pollution-advisory</link>
		<comments>http://www.brightnewideas.org/minnesota-air-pollution-advisory#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Ideas to Reduce Air Pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightnewideas.org/minnesota-air-pollution-advisory/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency today released an advisory that air pollution levels in the Twin Cities and southern Minnesota have been rated as &#8220;unsafe for sensitive groups&#8221; according to an article from the Pioneer Press.  But where did this pollution come from?
The Pioneer Press article, &#8220;Twin Cities under air pollution advisory,&#8221; written by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency today released an advisory that air pollution levels in the Twin Cities and southern Minnesota have been rated as &#8220;unsafe for sensitive groups&#8221; according to an <a href="http://www.twincities.com/allheadlines/ci_8164624?nclick_check=1" title="Pioneer Press, 4 Feb 2008 Air Pollution Advisory">article from the Pioneer Press</a>.  But where did this pollution come from?</p>
<p><span id="more-143"></span>The Pioneer Press article, &#8220;Twin Cities under air pollution advisory,&#8221; written by Nancy Yang was really just a short note, as follows:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Air monitors indicate that fine particles are at a level approaching unhealthy for sensitive groups in the Twin Cities. Air quality is already at an unhealthy level in the Rochester area, the agency said.  Sensitive groups include people with heart or lung disease, children and athletes.  To learn more about air pollution or to check hourly updates of the air quality index, visit http://aqi.pca.state.mn.us/index.cfm.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>My question is, what are these &#8220;fine particles&#8221; and where do they come from?  According to the <a href="http://www.pca.state.mn.us/gloss/glossary.cfm?term=Particulate_Matter,_Fine_(PM2.5)','400','250')">Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Website</a>, it is defined as follows:</p>
<dl>
<dt><strong>Particulate Matter, Fine (PM2.5) </strong> </dt>
<dd> 	Fine particulate matter is a complex mixture of very small  liquid droplets or solid particles in the air. Major sources are  cars, trucks, construction equipment, coal-fired power plants,  wood burning, vegetation and livestock. These particles can be  directly released when coal, gasoline, diesel fuels and wood are  burned. Many fine particles are also formed in the atmosphere  from chemical reactions of nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides,  organic compounds and ammonia. Fine particulates are associated  with increased hospitalizations and deaths due to respiratory  and heart disease and can worsen the symptoms of asthma. People  with respiratory or heart disease, the elderly and children are  the groups most at risk. Fine particles are also major  contributors to reduced visibility (haze). See Also 		<a href="http://www.pca.state.mn.us/gloss/glossary.cfm?termID=232&amp;header=1">Particulate Matter</a>,&#8221;</dd>
</dl>
<p>These fine particles sound a lot like the smoke produced by <a href="http://www.epa.gov/iaq/combust.html">kerosene lanterns</a>, Perhaps it&#8217;s no stretch of the imagination to state that it looks like we here in Minnesota are now experiencing outdoors on a wide scale the same air pollution problem that is faced on a daily basis in huts and shanties across the world where there is no access to electricity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brightnewideas.org/minnesota-air-pollution-advisory/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
